Shape Dynamics in 2+1 Dimensions

Abstract

Shape Dynamics is a formulation of General Relativity where refoliation invariance is traded for local spatial conformal invariance. In this paper we explicitly construct Shape Dynamics for a torus universe in 2+1 dimensions through a linking gauge theory that ensures dynamical equivalence with General Relativity. The Hamiltonian we obtain is formally a reduced phase space Hamiltonian. The construction of the Shape Dynamics Hamiltonian on higher genus surfaces is not explicitly possible, but we give an explicit expansion of the Shape Dynamics Hamiltonian for large CMC volume. The fact that all local constraints are linear in momenta allows us to quantize these explicitly, and the quantization problem for Shape Dynamics turns out to be equivalent to reduced phase space quantization. We consider the large CMC-volume asymptotics of conformal transformations of the wave function. We then use the similarity of Shape Dynamics on the 2-torus with the explicitly constructible strong gravity (BKL) Shape Dynamics Hamiltonian in higher dimensions to suggest a quantization strategy for Shape Dynamics.

Publication
Gen. Rel. Grav. 44 (2012) 1615-1636
Date

Citations

  1. Gomes, Henrique, and Tim Koslowski. “The link between general relativity and shape dynamics.” Classical and Quantum Gravity 29.7 (2012): 075009.
  2. Anderson, Edward. “The problem of time and quantum cosmology in the relational particle mechanics arena.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1111.1472 (2011).
  3. Mercati, Flavio. “A shape dynamics tutorial.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0105 (2014).
  4. Khoury, Justin, Godfrey EJ Miller, and Andrew J. Tolley. “Spatially covariant theories of a transverse, traceless graviton: Formalism.” Physical Review D 85.8 (2012): 084002.
  5. Gomes, Henrique, et al. “The gravity/CFT correspondence.” The European Physical Journal C 73.1 (2013): 2275.
  6. Anderson, Edward, and Flavio Mercati. “Classical Machian resolution of the spacetime reconstruction problem.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.6541 (2013).
  7. Gomes, Henrique, and Tim Koslowski. “Frequently asked questions about Shape Dynamics.” Foundations of Physics 43.12 (2013): 1428-1458.
  8. Gryb, Sean. “Shape dynamics and Mach’s principles: Gravity from conformal geometrodynamics.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.0683 (2012).
  9. Anderson, Edward. “Relationalism.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.1256 (2012).
  10. Khoury, Justin, Godfrey EJ Miller, and Andrew J. Tolley. “On the origin of gravitational Lorentz covariance.” Classical and Quantum Gravity 31.13 (2014): 135011.
  11. Koslowski, Tim. “Observable equivalence between general relativity and shape dynamics.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.6688 (2012).
  12. Koslowski, Tim A. “Shape dynamics.” Relativity and Gravitation. Springer, Cham, 2014. 111-118.
  13. Mercati, Flavio. Shape Dynamics: Relativity and Relationalism. Oxford University Press, 2018.
  14. Anderson, Edward. “Kendall◊≥ s shape statistics as a classical realization of Barbour-type timeless records theory approach to quantum gravity.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 51 (2015): 1-8.
  15. Roser, Philipp. “Quantum mechanics on York slices.” Classical and Quantum Gravity 33.6 (2016): 065001.
  16. Gomes, Henrique, and Tim A. Koslowski. “Shape dynamics and gauge-gravity duality.” THE THIRTEENTH MARCEL GROSSMANN MEETING: On Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Astrophysics and Relativistic Field Theories. 2015.
  17. Koslowski, Tim. “Quantum inflation of classical shapes.” Foundations of Physics 47.5 (2017): 625-639.
  18. Gonz√°lez, A., and H. Ocampo. “Path integral for (2+ 1)-dimensional Shape Dynamics.” International Journal of Modern Physics A 30.12 (2015): 1550057.
  19. Miller, Godfrey E. Cosmology as a probe of fundamental physics. University of Pennsylvania, 2013.
  20. Coleman, E., & Shyam, V. (2020). Conformal Boundary Conditions from Cutoff AdS3. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.08504.